City of Eugene – Âé¶¹ÊÓÆµ Wed, 01 Nov 2023 03:37:23 +0000 en-US hourly 1 https://wordpress.org/?v=6.9.4 /wp-content/uploads/2019/04/cropped-favicon_logo-32x32.jpg City of Eugene – Âé¶¹ÊÓÆµ 32 32 New Mobility Case Study /projects/new-mobility-case-study-2/ /projects/new-mobility-case-study-2/#respond Wed, 01 Nov 2023 03:37:23 +0000 https://portal.epicn.org/case-stories/new-mobility-case-study/ Read More... from New Mobility Case Study

]]>
The city of Eugene is interested in learning how its residents might benefit from technology-enabled ‘new mobility’ solutions to differently meet their transportation needs.

Student teams analyzed how members of a fictional or real household in Eugene could reduce their reliance on single-occupancy vehicles in daily commutes, local and regional trips, and infrequent travel destinations. For this project, new mobility is defined as a transportation mode that is:
• enabled by new technologies, including electric and autonomous vehicles, or;
• enabled by new business models or social trends, sometimes referred to as shared-use mobility (a categorization that typically includes bikesharing, carsharing, e-scooters, ridehailing, and even transit at various scales).

The implications of shifting a household’s transportation habits created tradeoffs between competing priorities of cost, time, flexibility, and sustainability. In order to understand
the financial implications, students were asked to analyze the full—and often overlooked—costs of vehicle ownership. Upon completing this analysis, many teams found significant
savings opportunities in adopting active transportation and shared-use mobility. Beyond financial cost, teams discovered opportunities, trade-offs, and barriers to adoption.

Teams found that households best served by existing new mobility solutions lived closest to the city center. Feasibility was often complicated by demographic factors including income,
age, and occupation. Cultural norms and attitudes toward car ownership played a role in whether households shifted their behavior, both for fictional household members and for the
authors.

Where currently available options were not feasible, students identified modes in other markets that might benefit Eugene residents. Students also examined emerging and future
technologies not currently in existence. While feasibility varied widely based on currently available modes, the city of Eugene can foster a transition to new mobility through partnerships that support multimodal first- and last-mile solutions. The City can also work to
educate residents by using tools and messaging to improving awareness,
perception, and trust in new mobility options.

]]> As part of the Sustainable City Year Program, students in Rebecca Lewis’s Growth Management course were asked to assess the comprehensive plans of the cities of Eugene
and Gresham, Oregon. Students sought to determine each city’s readiness for the deployment of new mobility services and autonomous vehicle and the continued growth of
e-commerce deliveries, along with accompanied changes to warehousing and brick-and-mortar retail.

Students analyzed city comprehensive plans, focusing on the cities’ commercial and residential land use patterns. Each group compiled written reports detailing their research, analysis, and findings. In the reports, students noted positive steps that the cities are taking to create pathways for these new technologies and provided recommendations for areas of improvement. In addition to the reports, the teams presented their findings to representatives from both cities.

Students were divided into four different teams to analyze the comprehensive plans. Two teams each assessed the comprehensive plans of the cities of Eugene and Gresham. For
each city, one group focused on the topic of new mobility and the other analyzed e-commerce.

The class evaluated the two cities’ comprehensive plans through initial independent research on e-commerce and new mobility. Students also looked at case studies of other cities and steps they are taking to address the issues. Then, students reviewed Envision Eugene Comprehensive Plan and Gresham Comprehensive Plan for policies and regulations that were conducive to allowing new mobility technologies within their city limits.

Read the final student report delivered to the local gov/community partner.

Sustainable City Year Program Contact Info
Megan Banks
Sustainable City Year Program Manager
mbanks@uoregon.edu
(541) 346-6395

University Faculty Contact
Rebecca Lewis
Design

rlewis9@uoregon.edu

Local Government / Community Contact
Jeff Petry
Transportation Planning
Parking and Technology Manager
jeff.t.petry@ci.eugene.or.us

]]>
/projects/future-proofing-comprehensive-plans-in-eugene-and-gresham-2/feed/ 0